Skip to main content

GPT-6.1 Sol

Keep the audience, evidence and constraints in view as the work develops.

Describe what you want to make, or drop a reference
Try a prompt:
GPT-6.1 Sol · 2026-10-21 · same reply · Q1/3

How should I prevent duplicate animation loops and input listeners when restarting a small HTML canvas brick-breaker game? Give a minimal lifecycle pattern, list the game state that must reset, and provide four checks that expose restart bugs. Do not produce a complete game or claim the pattern has been run.

Reset: ball position/velocity, paddle position, brick layout/hit points, score, lives, level, win/loss/pause flags, pressed keys, pointer/touch state, power-ups, cooldowns and physics timing accumulators. Clear held input on window blur too. Four checks: Restart rapidly 20 times: instrument frame updates; movement must not accelerate or multiply. Restart while holding a direction, then release: no stuck movement; one handler invocation per event. Restart after win/loss: bricks, lives, score and ball return to initial values. Stop/unmount and dispatch input: no updates or input effects; remount creates exactly one session.

View source
GPT-6.1 Sol · 2026-10-21 · same reply · Q2/3

How should a small React team choose between BlockNote and Tiptap for a Notion-style first version with paragraphs, headings, lists and reliable save-and-reload? Give a conditional initial choice, separate editor functionality from storage and permissions we must implement, and identify what must be verified before adding collaboration or comments.

Initial recommendation: Choose BlockNote if its interaction model meets your requirements and shipping a conventional Notion-style MVP is the priority. Choose Tiptap if custom editing behavior, document structure or UI control justifies more integration work. Prototype paragraphs, headings and nested lists before committing; verify required behavior rather than assuming parity.

View source
GPT-6.1 Sol · 2026-10-21 · same reply · Q3/3

For an online-first issue tracker with occasional disconnects and concurrent edits, when should a small team use server-first optimistic updates rather than local-first sync? Explain retry idempotency, conflict handling, reload recovery and server-side authorization. Identify which scaling problems in Linear's August 2026 delta-sync article do not, by themselves, justify copying its architecture.

Idempotency: Assign each mutation a stable operation ID; reuse it on retries. Atomically record deduplication and the write, with request-consistency checks. Conflicts: Send a base revision. Merge only explicitly safe independent changes; reject conflicting edits for reconciliation. Avoid silently replacing whole records. Reload recovery: Persist pending operations before implying durability; refetch authoritative state, reconcile uncertain outcomes, then retry using original IDs. Mark pending/failed edits clearly. Authorization: Recheck identity, tenant membership and object/field permissions server-side on every mutation and data delivery, including reconnects.

View source

How it works

Try it now
  1. 01

    Say what you want

    A sentence or two is enough.

  2. 02

    Work with HowWorks Agent

    Describe the result you want. The Agent works with the tools you choose.

  3. 03

    Make it

    Start creating, then keep working with HowWorks.

GPT-6.1 Sol at a glance

Good at
Carry a detailed brief through a long writing or research task.
Max output
128,000 tokens
Attachments
Images 20 MB · PDF 32 MB

About

A detailed brief has several requirements that must hold together: an audience, a clear argument, source material and a useful format. Give GPT-6.1 Sol those requirements up front and ask it to identify gaps before drafting. Agree on an outline, develop the sections, then review the result against the original brief. Keep a short list of decisions as you revise so a new section does not contradict an earlier one. This page selects GPT-6.1 Sol for the Agent conversation. Source collection, media creation through tools and final review are distinct actions.

Questions

How do I give GPT-6.1 Sol a detailed brief?

Include the reader, purpose, sources, required sections and constraints. Distinguish requirements from preferences, and ask the Agent to call out missing information before it writes a full draft.

How can I keep a long draft consistent?

Maintain a short list of approved terms, claims and decisions. After revising a section, ask for a check against that list and the outline. Inspect names, numbers and references before publication.

Can I use existing documents?

The current catalog includes image and PDF inputs. Attach material within the displayed limits and explain its role: evidence to cite, a style reference, or a draft to revise. Those are different instructions.

Does this page show that Sol is better than another model?

No. It describes a way to work with this model, not a benchmark ranking. For a useful comparison, use the same brief and sources, then assess accuracy, usefulness and the revisions you need.