Skip to main content
Open HowWorks

Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.5

A longer shot or a larger output? Start with the format your scene needs.

Describe what to make with Video
≈ – credits
Try a prompt:

Examples are being prepared.

When to pick which

Specs side by side

SpecSeedance 2.0Seedance 2.5
ModesText to Video, Image to Video, First & Last Frame, Reference to VideoText to Video, Image to Video, First & Last Frame, Reference to Video
Length4–15 s (presets 5, 10, 15 s)4–30 s (presets 5, 10, 15, 30 s)
Resolution480p, 720p, 1080p, 4K480p, 720p, 1080p
Aspect ratios16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4, 21:916:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4, 21:9
Image-led framingChoose an output aspect ratioMay follow the input image; check the output frame
SoundOn by default, can be switched offOn by default, can be switched off
Reference imagesUp to 9Up to 30
TiersStandard · Fast (480p/720p) · Mini (480p/720p)—

About

Seedance 2.0 and 2.5 share text, start-image, first/last-frame and reference-led video workflows, but their supported ranges differ. Seedance 2.0 offers 4–15 seconds, output through 4K on Standard, and Fast or Mini tiers at 480p or 720p. Seedance 2.5 offers 4–30 seconds, output through 1080p and a larger reference-image capacity. Both have an audio switch. For a longer visual passage, begin with duration; for a short high-resolution deliverable, begin with output size. These are supported-option differences, not a result ranking for every scene.

Questions

What is the main difference for planning a shot?

Seedance 2.5 extends the supported duration to 30 seconds. Seedance 2.0 offers 4K on Standard but stops at 15 seconds. Choose based on the actual clip length and output size needed, then inspect the generated result.

How do they handle an input image?

Seedance 2.0 needs an explicit output ratio for image-led generation. Seedance 2.5 follows the image for framing. Compose the source for its intended placement and check the selected settings before starting.

Which model supports more reference images?

The current model configurations allow up to nine for Seedance 2.0 and up to 30 for Seedance 2.5. Reference capacity describes supported input, not a guarantee of better subject preservation.

Can I compare a scene on both models?

Use a duration and frame both support, such as a short 16:9 shot, and record the actual tier, resolution and audio setting for each request. Review motion, subject continuity and sound against the same brief.

Is 2.5 automatically better because its version number is higher?

A version number does not decide whether a model fits your scene. Longer duration, higher output size, reference capacity and available tiers are different needs. Judge the actual results for the use that matters to you.